Character, Personality and Ethics
(The Map and The Territory)
Man develops along two lines - the
line of knowledge and the line of being, and
both lines must develop in balance. People who have not evolved in the line of being
do not have the understanding whereby such knowledge as they acquire can be
contexted and put to use. Their being is either asleep, or impaired (unable to
contextually expand) or immature. A person may have knowledge but no power to
do, i.e. to bring his knowledge into use, or for sound results. On the
other hand, if being outweighs knowledge a man has the power to
do, but does not know it nor – functionally – know how to proceed (His being is aimless and unsupported
by knowledge thus his efforts are useless as in the case of the
uneducated shepherd who is anointed king). A weak yogi is one who knows a great
deal but can do nothing, i.e. a man who does not understand what he
knows, or who cannot discern between one kind of knowledge and another. Development of being without knowledge
results in a stupid saint, i.e. one who could do a great deal but doesn’t know
what to do, nor the cause and effect of actions, thus he will act in accordance
with subjective feelings rather than informed understanding. When understanding
cannot bridge knowledge and being, both lines will be impaired. The thinking
apparatus may possess knowledge, but understanding only appears when man’s
essence (being) also feels
and senses what is connected with the knowledge.
(from Remedy’s Book Reviews – P.D.
Ouspensky’s “In Search of The Miraculous” – A Russian
philosopher’s findings
over seven years as understudy of the Armenian mystic and
teacher, Georges Gurdjieff)
“Regardless of what you say or do
or what face you show to the world, your mental-emotional state cannot be concealed.
Every human being emanates an energy field that corresponds to his or her inner
state, and most people can sense it, although they may feel someone else's
energy emanation only subliminally. That is to say, they don't know that they
sense it, yet it determines to a large extent how they feel about and react to
that person. Some people are most clearly aware of it when they first meet
someone, even before any words are exchanged. A little later, however, words
take over the relationship and with words come the roles that most people play.
Attention then moves to the realm of mind, and the ability to sense the other
person's energy field becomes greatly diminished. Nevertheless, it is still
felt on an unconscious level.”
(Eckhart Tolle - A NEW
EARTH: Awakening To Your Life’s Purpose)
“A man’s character is his
destiny.” (Heraclitus)
THE MAP:
[While a person will always be learning better techniques (roles) in
relationship, those who have developed character do not need to have any extra
personality. In other words, their inner character is in alignment with
their outer personality masks. They enact and play who they really are, and the
projector (character) becomes the projected (personality). The art of
living an authentic life is to develop and enact your character in the theatre
of your life and to play your authentic self without the need for masks. The
better that this is accomplished, the less chance there is of losing oneself in
one’s roles.]
·
Morality is a social construct whereby humans
can live together within their environment without destroying each other.
Different cultures have adopted differing codes of morality at different times.
Since it is a social construct, morality is more akin to personality than it is
to character – it is an acquired function and one learns the mores of
their tribe or culture and more or less tries to align themselves with those
mores so as to avoid upsetting others’ moral sensibilities and giving rise to
personal unpleasantness to oneself from others.
·
Ethics is the discipline of identifying and practicing a code of universal
principles that makes individual human happiness possible. Such happiness
is the fulfillment of what it means to be human, of the nature and virtue of
human consciousness, consisting of knowing, thinking, and love.
In that the principles are universal, the standards for ethics are higher than
for morality. The universal principles have appeared within all societies since
pre-history, and essentially entail honesty, truthfulness and compassionate
consideration for the feelings of others – especially significant others in our
lives. In other words, ‘doing to others as you would have them do to
yourself.’ To mindfully practice empathy and to put oneself in
the shoes of others. In practice this means deeply knowing that when you harm
others intentionally, you are concurrently harming your own self. To be truly
ethical means to sympathetically resonate with the creative thrust for
self-realization – not just for oneself, but for others as well – and thereby
to live a creative life, and this creativity extends to the building of a
community that is ethical and just. Ethics is an integral part of the
successful evolution of a family, and the unredressed condoning of unethical
conduct in the family by members precipitate its devolution.
·
Politics is
the discipline of identifying and practicing a code of socially sanctioned
principles that makes collective human happiness possible. To some
extent politics combines the mores of society with the universal ethic, but
since compromise is the touchstone of politics, it is often difficult to determine
which is predominant, the masks and techniques (personality) or the
politician’s integrity grounded in his essence (character). The nexus
dynamic is an example of grass roots, basic ‘politics’ that is experienced
by many people through involvement in groups; for instance in the ‘family
nexus’ dynamic – wherein loyalties within the family unit are
cemented through the reciprocal interiorization of each member within the
others; each member is essential to the nexus, and the nexus is essential to
the person, to the point that each acts on the others to maintain equilibrium
in the group dynamic, unchanged. There may be the appearance of collective
happiness within the nexus, but the main goal of group harmony – individual and
collective evolution – is absent, mainly due to the collective coercion geared
to averting change.
·
The purpose of morality or ethics is to create
ever-increasing balance and harmony within and among people, from which spring
forth happiness and fulfillment, the pursuit of which is the universal purpose
of human life
THE TERRITORY:
[This ‘dialogue’ didn’t just happen at one sitting,
but evolved over several years, through serious studies; through the careful
examination of transactions with others; and through extended discussions between
ourselves as – together – we tried to better understand the processes of
embodied life.]
Keith: Well, having set our feet upon the path of
dialogue, we might as well, as Krishnamurti said “Go Deeper”. So, having looked
at the linkages between one’s alignment towards the Ideal of Truth and
one’s ‘authenticity’ in that recently formalized Dialogue, let’s see how
these essential elements play out in one’s life through the main interactive
functions of Character, Personality and Ethics. We know from our travels that
maps are only starting points to experiencing actual territories, so hopefully
we’ll be able to give dimension to the intellectual distinctions above, from
our applied life experiences.
Marnie: In that the crux of living the
ethical life necessitates understanding the difference between one’s essential
self and the roles (masks) that one employs when interacting with others, let’s
look again at that Tolle quote in the preface. What that paragraph says
to me is that – notwithstanding the finesse and artistry with which we dress up
our relationships – all people have the natural, innate capacity to see through
each others’ personalities to the real character operating from within. We have
often discussed this innate sensing ourselves, long before reading Tolle, but
as is often the case, when the reality becomes so common as to be read in
others’ works, it is time to accept the matter as commonplace. Now since we can
see others beyond their roles and manipulations – if we truly want to – then the
reverse would also apply, that others can see beyond our masks to our
authenticity. All the more reason to truly know one’s true self – that is to
say one’s character – and adhere to one’s truest principles and ethics.
K: Agreed.
M: Now, then – as a business banker, you
were fortunate to have a vocation wherein it was necessary that you identify
certain traits in applicants so as to qualify them for financial assistance.
For instance, you would have to have ways of evaluating whether an applicant
just had a good ‘line’, or there was a quality of integrity present that could
be consciously ‘felt’. In other words, how would you identify potential clients
who manifested pleasing personality traits galore, but there was just a ‘feel’
about them that suggested the prudence of deeper probes and extensive
independent character checking? Without developing such ‘gut-feelings’ about
others, you wouldn’t have been able to do so much for so long. I remember you
commenting once that your vocation was a wondrous ‘psychological laboratory’,
in that skills could be developed not only though working with clients, but in
identifying employees’ character profiles and encouraging and motivating them
along the ethical development paths. Now, aside from the ‘map’ definition of
character, how did you traverse the territory?
K: Firstly, when I referred to ‘psychological laboratory’, I was
alluding to the study of ‘psyche’ in its original Greek sense, that is of
‘Soul’, another name for which is ‘character’ – the deeper integral part of
one’s timeless being that exists behind its temporal masks in society. This
relates to my oft-discussed personal perspective concerning reincarnation. That
one’s Soul (character) develops over great expanses of time, through many, many
life sequences. Further, there is a tight linkage between the reincarnating
Soul (character) and its Source, which some call the Over-Soul – in the East
this linkage is said to be between Atman and Brahman – and the linkage is the
intuitive conduit whereby Atman evolves to eventually become Brahman. To me,
the ‘character’ is like an automobile VIN#, identifying the primal entity
itself as it evolves very slowly across a vast arc of time, and it carries its
unique self-referencing energy imprint along with it; hence the old scriptural
saying “before Abraham was, I AM”. That I AM sense of embodied
consciousness is timeless. The ‘personality’ on the other hand is the ego with
its acquired masks that are employed in the Soul’s individual lives.
Behind the roles and masks of the personality, the ‘character’ watches to
observe the effectiveness of its personality games, and slowly fines-tunes
itself to perfection.
[In the ancient Hawaiian tripartite spiritual system, Huna,
the very durable Higher Self would represent the ‘character’, the Middle Self
would be the daily mind ‘personality’, and the Lower Self represents the
autonomic life-support system].
Secondly, in banking there is the maxim of “the
relativity of the moral risk” which translates to “everyone has their price, or
breaking point” – which is the point at which they will succumb to the
pressures of environment and abdicate their social contracts. That snapping
point may be either rooted in materiality (biological temptations, survival
imperatives, business reversals or financial pressures) or in socio-dynamics
(loss of social prestige or personal support base, to the extent that one’s
sense of self is impaired) – and then an individual may say “to Hell with it
all” and walk away from his/her obligations. Now, since we are all mortals and
thereby fallible, and since “everyone has their personal break-point”, the art
of evaluation tends to centre on calibrating the client’s core morality and
ethical integrity. If the client appears to lean more to the side of social
relativity than to core integrity, chances are that he will disappear on you
should things get hot. If the needle falls closer to the integrity side (he
knows that he will have to live with himself much longer than with others) then
– all other things being on the up-and-up – you have found a bankable
situation. Notice the emphasis on ‘core integrity’, as opposed to ‘enlightened
self-interest’; the latter is obviously important, since you want to see signs
that your client will act positively in advancing his position, but with
integrity. At root, you want to get a sense that – should the client find
himself in a bind and unable to meet the terms of his deal – he won’t just
disappear, but will confide his circumstances to you so that the contract terms
can be adjusted. You want to feel that two-sided trust is warranted, that both
client and backer sense they are committed to their common interests, and that
this ideal – or ethic – will endure as long as humanly possible.
Now, this example revolves around something pretty
basic: business monetary concerns. Yet the same principles are either present
or absent in more invisible, subtle relationships, and there the waters are
murky.
M: I follow your thinking thus far. Yet I
feel that the skills that a person acquires so as to calibrate character and
its related moral-ethical quotient in arms-length business transactions may not
serve so well when it comes to situations the same person has an emotional connection,
say within their own family transactions. Something about one’s wishful
thinking about one’s loved ones – a loss of critical detachment – that gets in
the way??
K: Perhaps. Let’s look at the similarities and the differences.
When a professional banker is screening applicants, he does have the advantage
of ‘passing’ on many potential clients who don’t measure up on the
moral-ethical risk scale. On the home front one doesn’t have the same luxury –
you only have so many clients (kids) and they in turn only have one banker to
turn to, at least until the time comes that they can tap their spouse’s
pockets. So it’s a bit of a symbiotic bind, and one’s brains are of limited
value when one’s heart strings are being strummed. But what the hell, it’s only
money, eh? The subtle aspects alluded to earlier involve personality
limitations as well as any character ethical deficiencies of the domestic
applicant, and development of the repertoire of one’s personality masks
requires time. The family scene is the crucible of both personality and
character development, and some family members may develop a little slower than
their impatient parents desire, yet inexorably the realization comes to all
that their time is not elastic, thus one’s personality games eventually recede,
and character integrity emerges.
[There is a reason for having placed
the Ouspensky quote at the beginning of this dialogue. It takes time for each
new generation to acquire knowledge of the personal growth dynamics, and
frankly the job for any of us is a life-long project.]
M: Now, from your own perspective, could you
mention what you have learned in what you’ve called the ‘give-regive’
banker-client exchange, and the counter-part of this exchange in
personal/domestic transactions?
K: OK. In the banker-client
‘give-regive’ exchange, once the two parties have decided that they want to
have dealings with each other, the banker ‘gives’ the negotiated loan proceeds
to the client, in exchange for which the client ‘regives’ his promissory note commitment
to repay the loan plus also pledges collateral, to show his sincerity
and commitment up front. By this stage both parties trust each other, and the
collateral is but a formal binder, or symbol of that trust. Bearing in mind the
‘relativity of moral risk’ aspect mentioned above, the collateral may later
also act as incentive for the client not to disappear.
Now in family transactions, the ‘give-regive’ exchange
domestically is much more subtle, since loans are seldom collateralized,
even via promissory note. It goes with the territory that – despite the best of
initial intentions – repayment may just not be in the cards – what does not
go with the deal is the beneficiaries’ treatment of their benefactors as being
unworthy of empathy relative to their own concerns, and unworthy of
treating with straightforward honesty – the hallmark marker of character. For
instance, there may be situations in which the children could counsel each
other in supporting the parents’ efforts to heal differences and sustain the
family’s cohesion, and this would represent a regiving of the parents’
freely given support. Sometimes considerable intensity of effort by family
members is necessary to bring about family healing. So, for one side the ‘gift’
might be needed financial assistance, for the other side the balancing ‘regift’
would be clear signals of timely, empathetic support in restoring family
unity. Otherwise, all may suffer, for if there is one essential rule in
relationships, it is to ‘Play fair, or you won’t be able to play at all’. Often,
all it takes to realign a confused, dysfunctional group into a positive
direction is for one person having the ethical bearing to speak to the
others with firmness, love and integrity. Remember, constructive anger is projected
love, and projects exemplar integral character and applied ethics, which of
course at root is based on rational and deliberate thinking blended with a
sense of ‘rightness’ followed by a courageous commitment to truth and the
Golden Rule.
As President Kennedy said: "The
hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis
maintain their neutrality."
M: Well, one certainly can’t impose one’s
ethical standards on others, but still it’s sometimes necessary to show a flash
of indignation, call a spade by its name and demand reciprocal support from
others. No one likes being victimized, and Lord knows there are positivity
cults around that coach people in how to reduce/override their normal human
sensitivity to others’ suffering. Through these ‘happy’ cults, people are
coached to see others who are going through a bad period as ‘victims’ or
‘losers’, and taught how to avoid connection or extend empathy to
others. Such life coaches prey on the ambitious, and such coaching sanctions
empathy deficits whereby the so-inclined feel free to grab whatever they can
without reciprocation.
K: Francis Bacon claimed
that “Knowledge is power,” but those who have walked the territory – not just
read the map – know that “Integrity
is power.” What others do – or don’t do – can only superficially affect
one; it’s others’ integrity that is affected, not our own.
M: Concerning “group-think”, it is so much easier to ‘go
along to get along’ with the crowd, indulging hidden desires and motivations
and telling ourselves “we didn’t know what we were doing” but still getting a
perverse satisfaction from doing it. So in group-think, one can say “Well, most
of the world works this way so it must be okay – everyone else does it and
we’re just part of the crowd”. With more intense effort and deeper examination
of themselves, it is likely that an individual’s life, and the lives of those
the individual touches would be much improved if they acted with more intuitive
courage.
K: Personally, I believe that ‘group-thinkers’ are pond-scum. By
the time people reach adulthood, they know what they are doing. It would
be completely unethical not to know. It would be unethical for people to not think.
And it is most unethical for people to not love and live impassioned
lives.
M: Yet I feel that – although people may be
old enough, educated enough and experienced enough to know better – perhaps
they may sometimes become a tad overconfident as to their relative positions
because of superficial appearances and group-think. Group-think is a slippery
slope wherein people abdicate to the safety of consensual opinion, but in the
process lose confidence in their own, innate ‘default settings’. By this I mean
their conviction that their own personal ethical intuitions are trustworthy.
These default settings are there to give us a feeling of security, a belief
that if we act with courage it will make a difference. Shatter your own
self-confidence, and then you get into a deep hole. Without earned self-trust,
everything goes wrong. At the same time, whilst it is necessary that people
find the courage to live from their intuitive base, there's always a chance
they could be wrong. We often learn more from our honest mistakes than from our
successes, and by learning from mistakes, people can evolve and fine-tune their
intuitive beliefs, personal truths and characters.
Ironically, parents may be fortunate when their family
members have turned their backs and indicated unwillingness to join in the give
and take of honest interaction. The parents then have the opportunity to reach
out into the world, walk new territories, and learn to rely on their own
experiences together for help in surviving in a sometimes tricky world. In time such a couple discover that their
Truth is within – it is who they are – and the still small voice of
Truth speaks in the language of their love.
K: Yes – Truth speaks in the language
of love. ‘Personality’ can mouth the words, but only ‘Character’ connects.
Character, moreover, not only in its ethical and political aspects – but also
in its spiritual vocation – is that dimension of human existence from which
people draw inspiration to put into practice their commitment to cultivate
capacities for openness, wholeness and harmony. Again, that lead quote above
from the Ouspensky-Gurdjieff teachings points to the necessity of a person
working on both ‘the line of being’ [read character] and ‘the line of
knowledge’ [read personality] to avoid imbalance. The linkage between the two lines
is ‘understanding’: understanding when to play the games of the world, and when
to transcend the games, remember oneself and make a difference.
What thoughts do you wish to mention to assist others
in developing their integral balance in life?
M: I feel that a person has to really know
herself, trust herself, and like herself. And I mean the real self, not just a
personality mask. Ekhart Tolle teaches that the ‘I’ normally spoken of is formed by our thoughts and
reactive emotions, in the roles we play, our memories, our possessions, etc.
but what we really are is part of the oneness of all, part of the
Source. Sometimes we can catch glimpses of this true ‘I Am’ in the gaps
between our ‘doings’ – when we are very still. I’d like to share a few quotes from
Tolle’s writings, in addition to that in our dialogue preface:
“Many things in your life matter,
but only one thing matters absolutely.
It matters whether you succeed or
fail in the eyes of the world. It matters whether you are healthy or not
healthy, whether you are educated or not educated. It matters whether you are
rich or poor — it certainly makes a difference in your life.
Yes, all these things matter,
relatively speaking, but they don't matter absolutely.”
From
that I have come to appreciate that there is something that matters more than
any of the ‘worldly’ things and that is finding the essence of who I AM
beyond the span of this short life or my short-lived personality sense of self.
As to nurturing a real self (character):
“As you go about your life, don’t
give 100 percent of your attention to the external world and to your mind. Keep
some attention within. Feel the inner body even when engaged in everyday
activities, especially when you are relating with nature. Feel the stillness
deep inside it. Keep the portal open.”
The
peace and assurance thus realized will be intuited by others if they are at all
open to it, and even consciously recognized. Further:
“Although you cannot know consciousness, you can become conscious of it
as yourself. You can sense it directly in any situation, no matter where
you are. You can sense it here and now as your very Presence, the inner space
in which the words on this page are perceived and become thoughts. It is the
underlying I Am. The words you are reading and thinking are the foreground, and
the I Am is the substratum, the underlying background to every experience,
thought and feeling.”
This gets pretty close to the ineffable mystery of
which we are an integral part. And more:
“So your physical body, which is form, reveals
itself as essentially formless when you go deeper into it. It becomes a
doorway into inner space. Although inner space has no form, it is intensely
alive. That "empty space" is life in its fullness, the unmanifested
Source out of which all manifestation flows. The traditional word for that
Source is God.”
K: Such an inspiring vision.
M: I find Tolle fascinating. In “A New
Earth”, there is an extensive section on a deep aspect of our energy field or
psychic life that he calls the “pain body”. This is a container for past
psychological injuries and slights against us – essentially the pain body is
our suffering warehouse. It is also a ‘driver’ within us, goading us to
suppress – if not eliminate – sources of pain. This psychic function runs on
auto-loops, reliving past painful situations as though we could thereby
desensitize ourselves to suffering. He writes: “This is not our ‘thinking’ –
this is possession – by a shadow part of our energies.” In such auto-loops, our
body systems are activated as in real time, our emotions are unleashed, the
memory loops become charged and a vicious cycle is created between our
unexamined thoughts and the emotional drivers, resulting in great bodily
stress. Tolle identifies this process as our living ‘karma.’ Being driven by
pain body processes can actually become addictive – an addiction to unhappiness
and chronic reactivity, feeding on negative thinking/drama in relationships.
Like any addiction, it has active and dormant phases, and the addict may need a
ready dose of unhappiness in their environment. Another’s pain becomes one’s
pleasure, and knowing that one has the keys to others’ happiness, but chooses
to withhold application of the key, becomes an art form.
K: Some pain body energy components seem to derive from beyond
our own histories or through inference from others’ stories. Perhaps the
components are an inheritance from our collective past (the human condition) – perhaps
a personal energetic bleed-through from our earlier lives.
M: Tolle describes the pain body from his
own first person experience, and eventually he came to see it as a
transactional personality defect. He actually came to deeply hate himself for his
actions, but he was unable to stop until such time as his self-loathing peaked
and he could no longer live with himself. He was lucky, in that he could live
contemplatively for many months, allowing time to heal him –
after which he could see the difference between his deeper self and his
personality masks. Through nurturing his deeper aspect – his essential
character – by various transformative processes, he was eventually able to
intuit skills of healing himself and then others.
K: When it comes to working on oneself, I feel that there is a lot we can
do for ourselves by tapping into the findings of others. I recall you
mentioning that Tolle learned much from the Australian spiritual teacher, Barry
Long. On our own travels, we talked with many people whose lives had been
transformed by teachers such as Gopi Krishna, Osho, Kirpal Singh and Gurdjieff.
All those teachers are now deceased, but the ideals and inspiration of questers
of the past illuminate our present and we resonate deeply within when reading
others’ Truths that we can assimilate into our own path.
In the experience of the mind, there is no time zone –
the unity achieved through the trans-century meeting of minds by means of
written storage transcends time, and the Truths which strengthened others long
dead live on and strengthen us in our own lives now. Plato, Thoreau, Emerson,
Whitman – all those who have previously traversed the territory can inform our
present character and our actions, if we but allow them to. Whatever helped
them, can help us – the commonality of human experience connects all humanity,
through all time. The wisdom of the ages calls to us out of the silences, and
whispers within in the Stillness.
M: A Devil’s Advocate might ask “In that ‘ethics’
comprises a major part of this dialogue, how ethical is it to treat
certain sensitive subjects so openly. What good could come from the exercise?”
K: As Ecclesiastes wrote “Nothing is
new under the sun”. I have walked the territory for 75 years in this edition,
and am convinced that – for both better and worse – nothing in the realm of
human interaction happens by random chance, but rather by planned individual or
collective intent, by specifically focused intention. Parents naturally
don’t like to see what their beloved family members are doing to themselves,
especially when they see the intentionality present. We have personally
benefited from reading of others’ experiences through the Internet, and thus
owe others our own findings as payment of that debt. We know from web-site
readers around the world that our message resonates with life in the territory
– others have been greatly helped through knowing they are not alone –
that “nothing is new under the sun” – the harmony of the whole human family is
adversely affected unless all pull together.
M: Right on, amigo!!
“Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the Truth?” Galations 4:16
Initially posted 08-11-06;
Updated and recast 29-09-12
Acknowledgement:
Our children – source of past fond memories and current
inspiration: And Our Children’s Children:
Everett Lloyd
Elliott (b.1960); and his wife Karen –
m. 1984 Bradley
Clement Elliott
(b.1964); and his wife Katariina – m. 1991 Keith Ronald Elliott
(b. Jan 1966 - died Mar 1966) Robert Dwight Elliott
(b.1969); and his wife
Kim – m. 2000 Melissa Dawn Elliott
(b.1971); and her husband Jeff
Whitaker – m. 2002 |
Meghan Elliott
(b.1987); Lauren Elliott (b.1991) Ryan Elliott
(b.1994); Kirsten Elliott (b.1997)
- - - - - - Olivia Elliott
(b.2002); Gavin Elliott (b.2004) Sawyer Whitaker (b.2003); Jackson Whitaker (b.2005) |
Home
|
Our Stories
|
The Sublime
|
Our World and Times
|
Book Reviews
|
Marnie's Images
|
The Journal
|
Gleanings
|
From The Writings Of. . .
|
Allegories
|