Amrit
Sorli, SpaceLife Institute,
Podere Petraiole, 53012 Chiusdino
(SI), Italy
spacelife@libero.it
What we
observe is not nature itself,
but nature
exposed to our method of questioning.
(Werner
Heisenberg)
Abstract
Current scientific experience of
space-time is rational. Space-time is experienced through the mathematical
models created by the mind. Human consciousness has the capacity to watch the
mind functions and to become aware of how mathematical models influence
experience. This awareness leads to conscious experience of space-time.
Key words: watching the mind, consciousness, conscious experience, time-space
Introduction: In
current scientific experience, space-time is first perceived by the eyes, then
elaborated by the rational mind, finally experience occurs.
perception
(eyes)+/- elaboration (mind) = experience
In
the process of elaboration the mind describes physical space-time with
different mathematical models. For example in the Special Theory of Relativity
physical space-time is described by Einstein-Minkowski space-time. One
experiences them through this model, one does not experience physical
space-time as perceived by the eyes. Mind's elaboration creates an
"information gap" between perception of physical time and experience
of it (1).
Einstein-Minkowski space-time
Human
consciousness has the capacity to watch the way mind functions. Watching it one
becomes aware that Einstein-Minkowski space-time is only a mathematical model
and not physical space-time itself. By having conscious experience one
experiences physical space-time as being perceived by the eyes. The
“information gap” that exists in rational experience is gone.
One
can imagine the mind as an optical prism. The prism is bending the light ray,
the mind elaboration is bending the authentic information. In rational
experience, one experiences physical space-time through the prism of the mind.
In conscious experience one experiences physical space-time authentic as it
reaches the eyes (2).
One can imagine the eyes as a digital
camera which registers the world. The information of the world registered by a
camera is authentic. Mind is a software that elaborates authentic information. Einstein-Minkowski
space-time is consistent part of the software. When the observer does not know
how to use consciousness as a research tool he will remain unaware of the
software, he will not distinguish between physical space-time (authentic
space-time) and mathematical space-time, his experience of the world will be
rational. When the observer knows how to use consciousness as a research tool
he will be aware of how software elaborates authentic information. His
experience of the world will be conscious. He is aware of the difference
between mathematical space-time and physical space-time.
Materials And Methods: Put
a pendulum in front of you and observe it. You perceive the pendulum as moving
in space only; about your experience that the pendulum is moving also in time
there is no experimental evidence.
How
is possible that you experience the movement of the pendulum in time without
perceiving it? Let's analyse the rational experience. The movement of the
pendulum that you observe is irreversible – movement A
transforms into movement B, B transforms into C and so on. When B is in
existence A does not exist anymore, when C is in existence B does not exist
anymore. You experience the irreversible movement of the pendulum through the Einstein-Minkowski space-time, so you experience movements
A, B and C as past, present and future. The movement of the pendulum is
irreversible, it has no duration. The sensation of "time running"
enters during the elaboration where Einstein-Minkowski space-time is a mental
form through which the movement of the pendulum is experienced.
Discussion: By having conscious experience, one experiences physical space-time as
perceived by the eyes: as an irreversible stream of material change in physical
space (physical space is considered as a space in which material objects
exist). Material changes that run in physical space have no duration. We give
them the sense of duration by comparing them with clocks , which are mechanisms
with constant speed; all material changes that we measure are compared with the
speed of clocks.
In
the universe, matter that is in continuous change can’t exist separately
from physical space. Together, they are
one physical reality called “space-time“. Time exists only as an irreversible
material change; physical space itself is A-temporal. From this point of view
it is more correct to understand physical space-time as A-Temporal physical
space in which irreversible material changes run.
In
the universe there is no past, no present and no future. These concepts exist
only in the mathematical models of physical space-time. Material changes (physical time) have no
direction, they run in A-Temporal physical space. "The arrow of time"
exists only in mathematical models and not in the universe itself. The universe
is an A-Temporal phenomena.
In
Newtonian physics, physical time is an independent quantity (absolute time),
running uniformly throughout the entire cosmic space (absolute space). In the
Theory of Relativity, time is no more an independent physical quantity - it is
linked with space in four-dimensional space-time. Here space-time is understood
as a stream of irreversible change that runs through A-temporal physical space.
Space-time has developed into an A-Temporal physical space within which changes
run (3).
Mathematical Description of
A-Temporal Physical Space: When Euclid was creating his geometry he was simply following the fact
that – for describing the position of a material object relative to another
material object in physical space – three coordinates are needed. If for
describing the position of a material object four coordinates would be needed,
Euclid would have developed four dimensional geometry. It is important to
understand that Euclidian geometry describes positions between material objects
in A-Temporal physical space only and does not describe A-temporal physical
space itself.
In
rational experience one experiences A-temporal physical space through three
dimensional Euclidian space. Having conscious experience one becomes
aware that A-Temporal physical space is not three-dimensional, but is
formless; it can be compared with what in Buddhism is called "true
vacuum": “The Buddhist contemplative science, in parallel to Western
physical science, describes two types of vacuums: (1) The false vacuum, or bhavanga,
is the relative ground of becoming, out of which each individual mind-stream
emanates; and (2) the true vacuum, or Primordial Awareness, the absolute state
of phenomena out of which space and time, mind and matter, everything in the
universe, emerge” (4).
Near-Death Experience And Awakening
of Consciousness:
When people are close to death, the mind
loses control and sometimes there is a sudden awakening of consciousness. One
can discover "true vacuum", one can have conscious experience of
A-temporal physical space: “This year at professional conferences at Oxford,
Paris and Prague, as last year at academic gatherings in Germany, Italy and
Greece, European astrophysicist Metod Saniga explained to his scientific colleagues
how the NDE research of Raymond Moody, Kenneth Ring and PMH Atwater has helped
him to develop a mathematical model of time that seems to offer solutions to
problems that have vexed scholars since Einstein. In brief, Dr. Saniga takes
seriously the testimony of NDEs when they describe being in a reality where
"time stops", and where some
"see the past, present, and future all at once." To this
occurrence of what he calls "the Pure Present", Dr. Saniga adds the
experience of mystics, clairvoyants and others who're experienced suddenly
being in the future, and still others who describe being drawn involuntarily
back into past” (5). “The Pure Present” here would be ‘Conscious Experience of
A-Temporal physical space’.
Regarding
“being in the future or the past”, the understanding here is that mystics and
clairvoyants enter into the collective unconscious that exists as a memory
of the human mind. It is not possible to go into physical past or future
because they do not exist (6).
Research done by Penrose and Hameroff suggest that the force of quantum
gravity acting on the mass of neurones within the brain may be responsible for
the emergence of consciousness. The process is fundamentally related to the
influence of quantum gravity on microtubule networks within the neurones
(7,8).
Consciousness
is not only a product of the brain, it is carried also by the gravitational
force of A-Temporal physical space. This idea opens new perspectives into
understanding of conscious experience and NDE of time and space. In both cases
awakening of consciousness gives experience of “timelessness” and
“spaciousness” because consciousness is carried by the gravitational force of
A-Temporal physical space. This view is close to the Buddhist understanding of
consciousness as a “true vacuum”.
Conclusions:
Scientific knowledge of the universe and of life is
relative, theories of the world are improving continuously. Consciousness as a
research tool can be of a great help in this process. In
current science, mathematical space-time is more real than physical space-time.
Using consciousness as a research tool one discovers that physical space-time exists only as material
change in A-temporal physical space.
References:
1. Sorli A. Sorli K. Conscious Experience Of
Time And Space. Spacetime & Substance, International Physical Journal,
Vol 4, Num 5 (20) p. 235-238 ,
(2003), http://spacetime.narod.ru/5-20-2003.html
2.
Sorli A., Sorli I. K. The Scientific Basis For The Development Of
Human Consciousness. Episteme, Perrugia, Italy,
Number 8, (2004). http://www.dipmat.unipg.it/~bartocci/ep8/ep8-sorli2.htm
3. Sorli
A. Sorli I. (2004). Mathematical Time And Physical Time In The Theory Of
Relativity, Electronic Journal of
Theoretical Physics (EJTP), Vol 1, Num 4 http://www.ejtp.com/articles/ejtpv1i4p25
4. Alan Wallace. The Potential of
Emptiness: Vacuum States in Physics and Consciousness, The Scientific and
Medical Network Review, No 77 (2001)
5. Bernstein
P. Physicist Uses NDEs to Clarify The Nature of Time, Vital Signs, Vol
22, Num 2 (2003) http://www.astro.sk/~msaniga/pub/ftp/intw-vs.pdf
6. Sorli A.
(2004). Physical Time And Psychological Time. Frontier Perspectives, Vol 13, Num 1
7. Penrose R. 'Shadows of the Mind' (Oxford),
377-391. (1994)
8. Hameroff S. 'Quantum Coherence in
Microtubules: A Neural Basis for Emergent Consciousness?' Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (1), 91-118. (1994)
Home
|
Our Stories
|
The Sublime
|
Our World and Times
|
Book Reviews
|
Marnie's Images
|
The Journal
|
Gleanings
|
From The Writings Of. . .
|
Allegories
|