Albert
Schweitzer (1875-1965)
[The
following words are excerpted from Chapter 26 of The Philosophy of
Civilization]
I
am life which wills to live, in the midst of life which wills to live. As in my
own will-to-live there is a longing for wider life and pleasure, with dread of
annihilation and pain; so is it also in the will-to-live all around me, whether
it can express itself before me or remains dumb. The will-to-live is everywhere
present, even as in me. If I am a thinking being, I must regard life other than
my own with equal reverence, for I shall know that it longs for fullness and
development as deeply as I do myself. Therefore, I see that evil is what
annihilates, hampers, or hinders life. And this holds true whether I regard it
physically or spiritually. Goodness, by the same token, is the saving or
helping of life, the enabling of whatever life I can to attain its highest
development.
In
me the will-to-live has come to know about other wills-to-live. There is in it
a yearning to arrive at unity with itself, to become universal. I can do
nothing but hold to the fact that the will-to-live in me manifests itself as
will-to-live which desires to become one with other will-to-live.
Ethics
consist in my experiencing the compulsion to show to all will-to-live the same
reverence as I do my own. A man is truly ethical only when he obeys the
compulsion to help all life which he is able to assist, and shrinks from
injuring anything that lives. If I save an insect from a puddle, life has
devoted itself to life, and the division of life against itself has ended.
Whenever my life devotes itself in any way to life, my finite will-to-live
experiences union with the infinite will in which all life is one.
An
absolute ethic calls for the creating of perfection in this life. It cannot be
completely achieved; but that fact does not really matter. In this sense
reverence for life is an absolute ethic. It makes only the maintenance and
promotion of life rank as good. All destruction of and injury to life, under
whatever circumstances, it condemns as evil. True, in practice we are forced to
choose. At times we have to decide arbitrarily which forms of life, and even
which particular individuals, we shall save, and which we shall destroy. But the
principle of reverence for life is nonetheless universal and absolute.
Such
an ethic does not abolish for man all ethical conflicts but compels him to
decide for himself in each case how far he can remain ethical and how far he
must submit himself to the necessity for destruction of and injury to life. No
one can decide for him at what point, on each occasion, lies the extreme limit
of possibility for his persistence in the preservation and furtherance of life.
He alone has to judge this issue, by letting himself be guided by a feeling of
the highest possible responsibility towards other life. We must never let
ourselves become blunted. We are living in truth, when we experience these
conflicts more profoundly.
Whenever
I injure life of any sort, I must be quite clear whether it is necessary.
Beyond the unavoidable, I must never go, not even with what seems
insignificant. The farmer, who has mown down a thousand flowers in his meadow
as fodder for his cows, must be careful on his way home not to strike off in
wanton pastime the head of a single flower by the roadside, for he thereby
commits a wrong against life without being under the pressure of necessity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In May, 1964, The
Courier reprinted from the World Book Yearbook "Albert Schweitzer Speaks
Out," a stirring report in which he writes movingly of his concern for
life and its future on this earth. He wrote of the origin of "Reverence
for Life" which is the basis for his most important book, The Philosophy
of Civilization. The following excerpts are from this report.
(by Lawrence Gussman)
From
childhood, I felt a compassion for animals. Even before I started school, I
found it impossible to understand why, in my evening prayers, I should pray
only for human beings. Consequently, after my mother had prayed with me and had
given me a good-night kiss, I secretly recited another prayer, one I had
composed myself. It went like this: "Dear God, protect and bless all
living beings. Keep them from evil and let them sleep in peace."
The
founding of societies to protect animals, which was actively promoted during my
youth, made a great impression on me. People actually dared to announce
publicly that compassion toward animals was a natural thing, a sign of true
humanity and that one must not hide one's feelings about it. I believed that a
light was beginning to shine in the darkness of ideas, and that it would glow with
ever greater brilliance.
In
the closing years of the century, I continuously pondered the question: does
our civilization truly possess the ethical character and energy essential to
its complete fulfillment? This led me further and further into studies of
civilization and ethics as they appeared in philosophical writings from 1850 to
1900. The most important philosophical writings of the time, I discovered,
looked upon civilization and ethics as things we had received, things left to
us, to be taken for granted and accepted as such. I could not escape the
impression that an ethical system regarded as final did not demand much of
people or of society. It was, in fact, an ethic "at rest."
In
looking back to the end of the century, I could never understand the optimism
over the achievements of the times. Everywhere, many seemed to suppose that we
had not merely advanced in knowledge, but that we had reached heights in
spirituality and ethics we had never attained before and would never lose. But
to me it seemed that we not only had failed to surpass the spiritual life of
past generations, but that we were really only nibbling from their
accomplishments, and that in many respects, our spiritual inheritance was
dribbling out of our hands.
On
numerous occasions, I was deeply distressed when inhumane ideas, publicly
pronounced, met simple acceptance instead of rejection and censure. More and
more, I turned my attention to the civilization and ethics of the last decade
of the 19th century. As I did so, I decided to write a thorough and critical
study on the spiritual state of the times in which I lived.
Despite
the mounting pressures at the hospital, I still managed to find time to reflect
on our civilization and our ethical values and why they were losing their force.
But now I had to tackle a more basic question: could a lasting, more profound,
and more vital ethical system be brought about? The sense of satisfaction that
came with my recognition of the nature of the problem did not last long,
however. Month after month went by without my advancing one step toward a
solution. Everything I knew or had read on the subject of ethics served only to
confound me even more.
In
the summer of 1915, I took my wife, who was in poor health, to Port-Gentil on
the Atlantic. I brought the meager drafts of my book along. In September, I
received word that the wife of the Swiss missionary, Pelot, had fallen ill at
their mission in N'Gômô, and that I was expected to make a medical call there.
The
mission was 120 miles upstream on the Ogooué River. My only means of immediate
transportation was a small, old steamboat, towing heavily laden scows. Besides
myself, there were only a few Africans aboard. Since I had no time to gather
provisions in the rush of departure, they kindly offered to share their food
with me.
We
advanced slowly on our trip upstream. It was the dry season, and we had to feel
our way through huge sandbanks. I sat in one of the scows. Before boarding the
steamer, I had resolved to devote the entire trip to the problem of how a
culture could be brought into being that possessed a greater moral depth and
energy than the one we lived in. I filled page on page with disconnected
sentences, primarily to center my every thought on the problem. Weariness and a
sense of despair paralyzed my thinking.
At
sunset of the third day, near the village of Igendja, we moved along an island
set in the middle of the wide river. On a sandbank to our left, four
hippopotamuses and their young plodded along in our same direction. Just then,
in my great tiredness and discouragement, the phrase, "Reverence for
Life," struck me like a flash. As far as I knew, it was a phrase I had
never heard nor ever read. I realized at once that it carried within itself the
solution to the problem that had been torturing me. Now I knew that a system of
values which concerns itself only with our relationship to other people is
incomplete and therefore lacking in power for good. Only by means of reverence
for life can we establish a spiritual and humane relationship with both people
and all living creatures within our reach. Only in this fashion can we avoid
harming others and, within the limits of our capacity, go to their aid whenever
they need us.
It
also became clear to me that this elemental but complete system of values
possessed an altogether different depth and an entirely different vitality than
one that concerned itself only with human beings. Through reverence for life,
we come into a spiritual relationship with the universe. The inner depth of
feeling we experience through it gives us the will and the capacity to create a
spiritual and ethical set of values that enable us to act on a higher plane,
because we then feel ourselves truly at home in our world. Through reverence
for life, we become, in effect, different persons. I found it difficult to
believe that the way to a deeper and stronger ethic, for which I had searched
in vain, had been revealed to me as in a dream. Now I was at last ready to
write the planned work on the ethics of civilization.
I
began to sketch in the volume on my philosophy of civilization. The plan was
simple. First, I would give a general view of civilization and ethics as set
forth in the writings of the world's great thinkers. Secondly, I would occupy
myself with the essence and the significance of the ethics of reverence for
life.
The
fundamental fact of human awareness is this: "I am life that wants to live
in the midst of other life that wants to live." A thinking man feels
compelled to approach all life with the same reverence he has for his own.
Thus, all life becomes part of this own experience. From such a point of view,
"good" means to maintain life, to further life, to bring developing
life to its highest value. "Evil" means to destroy life, to hurt
life, to keep life from developing. This, then, is the rational, universal, and
basic principle of ethics.
We
must try to demonstrate the essential worth of life by doing all we can to
alleviate suffering. Reverence for life, which grows out of a proper
understanding of the will to live, contains life-affirmation. It acts to create
values that serve the material, the spiritual, and ethical development of man.
Early
in 1923, the text of my work, now called The Philosophy of
Civilization, was ready for printing. But where to find a
publisher? The prospects were unfavorable. In Germany, people were raving about
Oswald Spengler's fascinating and brilliant work, The Decline of the
West. For Spengler, Western culture was something that had
bloomed in history and was now dying. This tragic point of view was in keeping
with the spirit of the time - the disillusionment and cynicism that came after
World War I. In reality, Spengler had not investigated the nature of culture,
but was merely describing the historical fate of a culture. How could I, in
this climate, expect people to consider my views on civilization and ethics?
Thus, because I lacked courage, I did not undertake to make contact with a
publisher.
At
that time, Mme. Emmy Martin, the widow of an Alsatian pastor, was assisting me
with my correspondence. She asked to be allowed to take the manuscript along
during her visit to a friend in Munich. She hoped to find a publisher there,
even though she did not know any personally. While on an errand, she stopped
off at the publishing firm of C.H. Beck and asked to talk to the director. A
Mr. Albers introduced himself as the director's representative. Mme. Martin
explained her mission. Mr. Albers glanced through the first few pages of the
manuscript and said: "We take this manuscript for publication unread.
Albert Schweitzer is no stranger to us."
By
chance, C.H. Beck was also the publisher of Spengler's book. This is how
Spengler and I met. Instead of fighting with each other, Spengler and I became
friends and often amiably discussed our conflicting conceptions of culture. The
Philosophy of Civilization was published in 1923. A deep friendship
developed between Mr. Albers and me. It ended when Hitler came into power, and
Mr. Albers took his life rather than live under a dictator.
Today,
many schools throughout the world are teaching reverence for life. Everything I
hear and learn about the growing recognition of reverence for life strengthens
my conviction that it is the fundamental truth mankind needs in order to reach
the right spirit, and to be guided by it.
For
today's generation, this is of a special significance. Compared to former
generations, inhumanity has actually grown. Because we possess atomic weapons,
the possibility and temptation to destroy life has increased immeasurably. Due
to the tremendous advances in technology, the capacity to destroy life has
become the fate of mankind. We can save ourselves from this fate only by
abolition of atomic weapons.
We must not allow cruel national thinking to prevail. The abolition of atomic weapons will become possible only if world opinion demands it. And the spirit needed to achieve this can be created only by reverence for life. The course of history demands that not only individuals become ethical personalities, but that nations do so as well.
Albert Schweitzer 1875- 1965
Humanitarian
Celebrated humanitarian, theologian and philosopher Albert Schweitzer
turned to medicine at age 30, after a successful career in music. As a
physician and Christian missionary, he dedicated himself to the hospital that
he set up in French Equatorial Africa (now Gabon) for the treatment of various
ailments including leprosy and sleeping sickness.
He was awarded the Nobel Prize for peace in 1952 for his service to humanity. Though he periodically returned to Europe for fundraising purposes, Schweitzer lived in Africa from 1913 until his death.
Home
|
Our Stories
|
The Sublime
|
Our World and Times
|
Book Reviews
|
Marnie's Images
|
The Journal
|
Gleanings
|
From The Writings Of. . .
|
Allegories
|